[00:00:26] Ohh, well, my rocket (the last stage of it) has just 8100 m/s dv, so I guess it wouldn't make it 'everywhere'. It was interesting to build, though. [00:19:45] Rover is working on a planet pack? interesting. [00:32:10] ve2dmn done anything with kos today? [01:12:32] docking inside a cargo bay with the door closed because I can't turn SAS on without a RCS feedback loop on the main vessel [01:12:45] AND I had to take the RCS thruster blocks off to fit it into the cargo bay [01:16:29] Hello. [01:17:41] hi [01:17:53] Heil Mod9000 [01:18:15] How are you? [01:18:19] I'm male. [01:18:46] Alright. How are you? [01:18:57] I'm expired. [01:19:15] As in, exhausted, or otherwise? [01:19:23] Beyond my best before date. [01:19:46] Sorry to hear... [01:20:24] I'm rich. [01:21:14] I'm a bit tired at the moment. Many things will most likely go over my head. [01:21:26] I have 14 MVF. [01:21:55] I do not understand, but okay. [01:22:05] 14 million virtual funds. [01:22:28] Should I congratulate you? [01:22:33] sure [01:22:34] why not [01:22:47] Have you achieved orbit? [01:23:30] Is this an RP group? [01:23:58] If so, I am out of place with the added bonus of lacking any knowledge. [01:23:58] Well, it's a bit of role play if I say I'm a millionaire in KSP money. [01:24:29] Have you played Kerbal Space Program? [01:24:48] Funny thing, that. [01:24:54] Never heard of it. [01:25:03] Whoa, RP KSP. [01:25:09] Check it out. There's a free demo on steam. [01:25:11] That's ... hard to imagine. [01:25:38] I don't play games online... [01:25:46] It's an offline game. [01:27:10] I don't know what's going on here [01:27:25] We do not allow RP in this channel [01:27:32] Looks like someone is putting on their robe and wizard hat. [01:27:37] Or on the forum for that matter [01:28:07] putting on my robe and wizard hat would mean I'm not *always* wearing my robe and wizard hat [01:28:18] TheKosmonaut: So I'm not allowed to play Jeb here? [01:30:11] Well... I've still never heard of it. [01:30:55] Err, anyway. Is there a good place for a conversation? [01:32:16] Dunno. I've only been to this channel on espernet. I'm mostly on freenode. [01:32:33] Shoot... Thanks! [01:33:03] I'm limited in channel options. [01:36:45] yay re-entered without flat spinning [01:38:14] Lili-Anna: this channel is supposed to be focused on KSP (Kerbal Space Program) but it's also very off topic about 2/3 of the time [01:41:30] Thank you for that, TheKosmonaut. [01:41:51] I just...need a conversation. [01:42:15] awkward landing, lost rear "land assist gear", but rest of plane is intact, and gear landed on runway so I'll still get the recovery value for it :D [01:42:20] You're welcome here of course. Just watch for the various traps. [01:42:57] What kind of traps? [01:43:00] madmerlyn: it was an impromptu structural integrity test! Congratulations, you passed. [01:43:05] haha [01:43:24] Lili-Anna: trap doors, crocodile moats. The usual [01:43:32] it's my latest mk3 SSTO, just completed the second mission to tear down parts of my asteroid station [01:43:41] Also, thank you. (I might become a broken record with those two words. [01:43:50] part count was up in the laggy territory and the science lab dried up [01:44:03] so I'm stripping it down to be a purely fuel depot [01:44:07] Sounds fun! [01:44:07] And be extra careful around Rokker. He's very defensive when it comes to MiGs. He loves Russian airplanes [01:44:25] Rokker... Okay! [01:45:06] Do I have a misunderstanding of what role-play is? [01:45:16] TheKosmonaut stripped down HKO asteroid station, getting ready to start my Deep Space mission in station that's been orbiting Minmus empty for about a year [01:45:38] TheKosmonaut: screw you [01:45:46] ayyy it's Rokker [01:45:57] [01:45:59] Lili-Anna: oh. Well in this channel. There have been people in the past that join, roleplaying a character from the game. [01:46:10] madmerlyn: where [01:46:12] It gets very tiresome [01:46:30] Mar A Lago maybe? [01:46:46] Well, luckily, I lack any and every knowledge of this game. [01:46:56] what a strange place to end up then [01:47:07] Lili-Anna: do you play games at all? [01:47:07] it's a game about orbital mechanics [01:47:22] Pandemic is a popular one. [01:47:35] madmerlyn: and then some [01:47:41] (Pandemic legacy, that is.) [01:47:55] I still have no idea how to approach writing a spaceplane landing script for kOS [01:48:16] Err, yes. Yes, I play board games and a couple card games. [01:48:23] programmatically orbiting is easy, landing.. that's.. a lot harder hehe [01:48:48] I will wish you luck, Madmerlyn. [01:49:22] I can land the planes manually Lili :) I'm just being a nerd and trying to write autopilots from scratch using a mod [01:49:30] Is pandemic like plague Inc? [01:49:40] I assume so. [01:50:11] I was just excited to get my last re-entry accurate without flat spinning [01:50:33] first step in solving landing programmatically is figuring out how to do it consistently manually :P [01:52:50] Ah! I forgot to ask. Would you explain MiGs? [01:53:35] Twin engine jet fighter, surgery... [01:53:51] surgery? [01:54:09] yes, it's a former Soviet, current Russian fighter jet [01:54:24] Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery [01:54:37] or family of jets actually [01:54:47] Sounds cool! [01:56:04] boo, got a rescue kerbal+ship contract and it's too big to fit into my mk3 cargobay, guess I'll have to oldschool it and tug it back in with a heatshield [01:56:34] So, be wary of the crocodile moats,MiGs, and trap doors. [01:57:01] TheKosmonaut did you see my latest spaceplane earlier? [01:57:49] I got OPT for wings and Mk4 for parts, so retired my pure stock cargo plane [01:58:45] Say, since you all seem to be into games, any suggestions? [01:59:05] KSP will teach you a lot about space :D [01:59:29] in a slightly less intimidating format than real space exploration [01:59:59] Thanks, Madmerlyn! ^^ [02:00:20] my latest plane: https://i.imgur.com/CIAUwv8.png [02:01:16] can take orange tank to low orbit, or 18t to high orbit, with plenty of fuel left for deorbit and flight maneuvers, I've had to do some high thrust hops to get over the mountains on several loss of control authority incidents [02:01:56] Looks good! My understanding is, that's an upgrade. [02:03:05] What about you, TheKosmonaut? [02:03:22] actually think after losing gear on last flight I'll take the landing assist gear off, I haven't had issues with tailstrikes on this model [02:04:34] If it's okay, I'll nod and smile. [02:05:10] hey is this a record 60000 petameters [02:05:19] (For the lack of understanding that I seem to have an abundance of.) [02:05:48] basically, the game doesn't have stuff like multiposition landing gear, so I put special gear that I only use during landing and not during takeoff towards the back of the plane [02:06:01] so when I land the tail doesn't hit the ground and break [02:06:27] but this particular plane doesn't have that problem, my previous plane had it frequently because the take-off gear was so far up the chassis [02:08:40] I'm glad to hear it. [02:09:52] Fukboi A boy that thinks he can get in any girls pants. Chances are he comments heart eyes on girls Instagram in hopes of getting her to like him. You can often find them lurking in the girls bathroom at star bucks to swoop in and fuck yo bitch. White Girl 1: Oh my gawd Karen!!!! GAVIN JUST COMMENTED ON MY SELFIE!!! *squeals* White Girl 2: "Ew what the actual fuck Jessica. Why would you be excited over Gavin?!? He is a total man whore. He is the biggest [02:10:13] um what? [02:10:35] Connor: no [02:10:40] None of that [02:10:45] def of fuckboi [02:10:56] Read the channel rules [02:11:02] No language [02:11:05] Fuck you [02:11:14] Fuck the rules [02:11:18] Connor kicked from #kspofficial by TheKosmonaut: Connor [02:11:37] I think discord has spilt over into IRC [02:11:37] [02:11:43] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+b *!*@75.130.20.66' by TheKosmonaut!sid152460@ealing.irccloud.com [02:11:49] Action: Azander sighs [02:12:08] Wish this was over on the irc network I run, it would be a network ban instead of just a channel one :/ [02:12:12] Connor kicked from #kspofficial by TheKosmonaut: Connor [02:12:12] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+b Connor!*@*' by TheKosmonaut!sid152460@ealing.irccloud.com [02:13:46] Well, at least I now know the language here won't be bad. [02:14:26] Can I just have lunch in peace [02:15:30] ...Who was that directed towards? [02:15:49] the banned idiot I suspect [02:16:19] Okay. [02:16:30] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Supernovy' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [02:16:55] (I ask because it seemed a direct response to my own comment.) [02:20:42] Did I tell you guys I'm doing a Duna mission using the Lockheed Martin proposal as my guideline? [02:22:00] here's the lander I made for it https://i.imgur.com/EafdIH1.png [02:23:11] cool [02:23:25] Cool# [02:23:31] *Cool! [02:25:06] madmerlyn: Nice [02:25:32] neato [02:25:52] obviously couldn't put an external elevator on it so it has ladders [02:26:18] and couldn't find a nice drop down ramp so the bottom is a Karibou attached to a node and rotated [02:26:47] my base camp isn't going to look a whole lot like the Lockheed design though, mostly because of all the stuff I'm bringing along for USI-LS etc. [02:27:30] and instead of using base camp as the interplanetary transit, I'm going to set it up as a permanent station and use my Orion analog (which definitely doesn't look like an orion) to do the transfer [02:28:46] LM design calls for sending the science module ahead and then the crew comes with the rest of the base camp, I'm just going to send the entire base camp ahead instead of science module, and have the crew come in on a vessel with enough hab to get them there within safety margins [02:29:50] initial mission will include a powerplant and a few survey probes, so I can scout out resources before the kerbals show up [02:42:06] Disconnected. Back! [02:42:06] Azander: i think we have some ircops here [02:42:29] at least one, can't remember who [02:43:29] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Supernovy' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [02:44:51] Ircops? [02:46:11] internet relay chat operators [02:46:31] the people here who have @ here before their name are channel operators [02:46:40] ircops are network operators [02:48:31] Interesting... [02:48:48] Action: Azander is an ircop on 2 different network, just not this one :/ [02:49:04] Lili-Anna: they're the ones who can kick, ban and stuff like that [02:49:34] ´/whois Lili-Anna [02:49:38] ops [02:51:20] I'm no one. [02:51:39] Not here. Anyway. [02:51:56] *Not here, anyway. A bit new. [03:09:59] ... [03:10:33] Hello! [03:14:40] Rokker [03:16:17] How are you? [03:16:24] https://youtu.be/gXfnrEguhxA [03:16:24] YouTube - Darude - Sandstorm (Potato Cover) [03:16:26] the green space people, and non-green [probably non-green] internet people welcome you, Lili-Anna [03:17:03] Well, thank you! I appreciate that, Kuzetsa. [03:17:32] :( :( :( [03:17:54] I can never tell if it's someone's autocorrect / tab completion trying to be considerate, or someone manually capitalizing kuzetsa [03:19:01] Apologies, kuzetsa. I normally capitalize names. [03:19:18] like - it's either someone's software assuming people don't make the right capitalization decision on their own nicks (which means the software designer made the assumption, auto-tab or otherwise), or the person manually typing it does the same [03:19:39] RoKkeR [03:19:47] ellen (ellen degeneres) isn't capitalized [03:19:51] intentionally [03:20:27] I never ran into a problem with someone's name being wrong. Once again, apologies. [03:24:17] Do you accept my apologies, kuzetsa? [03:26:41] Action: madmerlyn blinks. [03:27:40] (Im tired. Please don't judge me based off this single day. Thank you.) [03:28:37] hmm? oh I was AFK [03:28:44] ok [03:28:55] ((Rephrase. Please don't form opinions of me based off of today.) [03:29:09] Alright. ^^ [03:29:19] was more stating a personally relevant peve than casting judgement on your personality [03:29:48] Thank you for clearing that up. [03:29:51] the premise / logic for a particular grammar thing annoys me [03:30:14] I'd rather not judge a book by it's cover though [03:30:24] 'cause that's a fallacy too [03:30:24] heh [03:30:33] *its [03:30:34] in English proper pronouns, of which nicknames count, are always capitalized. Seems a rather odd peeve to get bent out of shape over [03:30:46] Also, Ellen is capitalized, she just uses a lowercase e in her branding. [03:30:48] madmerlyn: your nick isn't capitalized :P [03:30:57] I also don't care if someone caps my name [03:31:36] yep - it's yours [03:31:38] my name is more or less all lowercase because I was too lazy to bother capping both Ms [03:33:13] anyway - my shape is unbent. my original wording was about people trying to be gramatically proper but really they're just presuming the other party considers a change in capitaliziation is desirable [03:33:30] because it's percieved as the considerate thing to do [03:33:57] It is, by general population. [03:33:58] I don't see the logic in it [03:34:23] my solution is to capitalize absolutely nothing except the singular "I" [03:34:31] the logic is proper nouns are capitalized and people are used to it [03:34:40] prescriptivism [03:35:07] there's not much logic in removing all critical thinking and analysis and falling back on prescriptivism "because it's the right way" [03:35:33] critical thinking? It's grammar, something that is heavily into conforming to rules [03:35:51] sure, if authoritarian rules are a thing you enjoy [03:35:56] You shouldn't really get upset over it. It's considerate by general standard. [03:36:03] also non-native speakers have a hard enough time with English's tendacy to break the rules [03:36:24] I agree with Madmerlyn, there. [03:36:37] to each their own [03:36:55] authoritarian rules? lol we're talking about capitalization not the First Amendment [03:37:02] the messaging is that pre-defined rules matter more than personal preferences [03:37:18] you're making a mountain out of an ant hill [03:37:20] ..........I guess?? [03:37:30] ::shrug:: [03:37:38] there's not zero logic in my viewpoint [03:37:48] I know that perscriptivism exists [03:37:57] kuzetsa, I believe you've stated your point. [03:38:04] it's not perscriptivism, no one told you you should capitalize your nick [03:38:22] The majority of the people in this conversation disagree. [03:38:42] (To kuzeysa. Not Madmerlyn.) [03:38:43] I get that [03:39:00] yeah that just felt like it was out of spite though [03:39:00] Hey [03:39:03] This conversation [03:39:04] It's over [03:39:25] Y'all getting bent outta shape over a small case K [03:39:25] WE SHOULD ALL TALK LIKE TELEGRAPH MESSAGES STOP [03:39:52] tawny but I don't know cherokee [03:40:06] THAT WOULD BE INTERESTING STOP [03:42:35] Georgia beat OK, if Bama beats Clemson we'll have an All SEC championship next week [03:42:37] madmerlyn: I don't think many people do - my grandmother grew up during the period where there was a push for cultural assimilation and making sure all the native persons spoke english. I'm not even sure there's a keyboard layout for the written form even though the unicode consortium added the letters for writing out the sequoyah syllabary in the past decade or whenever :/ [03:43:42] re: cherokee [03:43:55] it was a joke in reference to codebreakers.. [03:44:04] ah :/ [03:44:12] yeah that was a thing too [03:44:14] meh [03:44:25] .....*kuzetsa. (Rather than kuzeysa. Sorry for that typo!) [03:45:06] Cherokee https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/FTQHhTeY/1514864677.JPG [03:45:08] I just noticed that. (And I often correct typos.) [03:45:41] heh that client shows the gecos field thinger which gets pulled in by a lot of IRC clients. okay. [03:46:19] well assuming a posix-flavored OS [03:46:53] Best keyboard is still T9 [03:47:03] ANIHORTES > T9 [03:47:04] :3 [03:47:16] https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/IlbDXg87/1514864831.JPG [03:51:41] huh I just realized anihortes and dvorak prioritize most of the same letters for the same reasons [03:53:27] Action: TheKosmonaut checks for a Dvorak layout [03:57:17] I haven't used a dvorak keyboard before [03:57:40] Action: darsie uses the Dvorak layout on a German keyboard. [03:58:03] I'm going to clock out. [03:58:25] G'night, everybody! [03:58:40] @ TheKosmonaut Japan is insane https://i.imgur.com/gKb2zIu.mp4 [04:01:02] Iskierka: is there a source for that clip? Looks pretty cool [04:01:33] someone took Tamiya mini 4wd to the extreme, far as I can identify. Not found the actual source clip [04:02:23] https://youtu.be/PbAfbCVizdo?t=32 different clip trying the same thing (and try open it in a way to keep the timestamp, intro music is bleh) [04:02:23] YouTube - tamiya mini 4wd super highspeed [04:03:33] wouldn't be surprised if the original clip uses too much kanji for me to know what to search [04:35:00] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Supernovy' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [07:32:30] Last message repeated 1 time(s). [07:32:30] mechjeb. cheating or nah [07:43:26] up to you [07:47:43] Apollo Guidance computer: Cheating or nah? [07:51:02] .. what about the AGC? [07:54:50] cheating or nah? [08:02:07] mean.. in real life or in game? [08:03:43] I don't think its cheaty... then again, I know a lot about it myself [08:17:54] I can't really say it's cheaty when IRL people used it in the 60's [08:18:17] That's kind of not cheating unless you think they should have gone to the moon raw dogging it with no maneuver planner. [08:18:39] The navball is cheating. DV readouts are cheating. Doing math to figure out your TWR is cheating. [08:21:03] those days, people didn't exactly read things out in DV [08:21:27] what I think is most cheaty is how much fine control ksp engines are allowed to have [08:22:28] the LEM has the most control of its descent engine. Even that was limited. It was capable of 1g thrust down to something like 10%, in incriments. [08:22:58] I find myself never really caring about that part, honestly [08:23:17] the times at which my engines aren't either at full throttle or off are very few [08:26:39] i think reaction wheels are cheating.. [08:27:34] the AGC was more for guidance and instrumentation.. also helped run some of the optical tools onboard. A lot of the figuring out was done on the ground by bigger mainframes [08:27:40] it even looks cooler using rcs to control attitude, and makes you attempt to be more efficient at it. [08:29:12] reaction wheels do seem a touch.. over powered. there are systems that actually use RW.. the biggest being the ISS.. smallest being MOST, which I was just reading up on. It was a small suitcase sized telescope built by Canadians [08:36:21] it must be a huge mechanism on the iss [08:37:47] a pair of units on the truss section.. I think each has 4 gyros each [08:42:23] the ISS's gyros are enormous also [08:42:42] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/ISS_gyroscope.jpg four of these in a block [08:44:54] although, that'd probably be about the size of a 1.25m or 2.5m reaction wheel part in KSP, I guess [08:47:51] https://cdn.neow.in/forum/uploads/monthly_2015_08/main-qimg-791efbf0680db12a16fb5f9892fb4c65.thumb.png.eb56e6dbcf0523486fd8c280dfbc04b9.png [09:02:02] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Supernovy' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [10:59:43] hhhhhrrrg... [11:00:26] launching at the right time to do a direct rendezvous with an already orbiting part... [11:00:34] lol.. sometimes feels like hit or mis [12:04:37] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o technicalfool' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [14:58:52] Last message repeated 1 time(s). [14:58:52] Hi all and happy new years! [15:01:14] Merry Christmas! [15:01:44] Jolly Waiting For The Friggint Summer Already! [15:03:04] hi [15:03:10] hello [16:17:04] good morning fellow rocketeers. [16:20:01] hi [16:20:10] heh [16:20:18] hehe [16:20:26] Mod9000 always there to make you feel not alone in the universe, unlike all the aliens who are clearly avoiding us [16:21:00] maybe they are just not in our light cone [16:21:24] that's what I never understood about the Prime Directive in Star Trek, if a civilization hasn't achieved warp yet, but has already advanced to basic space travel, why make them feel like they're alone? [16:21:44] because it would change their progression [16:21:53] but they're already exploring space [16:22:02] too disruptive [16:22:03] there was an episode about it [16:22:15] where the population, including politicians were xenophobic [16:22:29] and they noticed the observers [16:23:06] well any alpha species is going to have warlike past etc., but I don't think discovering warp technology in itself is a good metric to establish that they are beyond their primal instincts as a society [16:23:09] look at the Klingons [16:23:23] klingons are relatively ok [16:23:41] isn't their entire social structure built around war? [16:23:47] but also around honor [16:24:16] compare it to the dominion [16:24:47] honour* [16:26:13] I just don't think a civilization's ideology is going to be fundamentally changed by the discovery of warp, Prime Directive should include making peaceful contact with any space-faring civilization, and actively preventing espionage from any that are overtly aggressive or xenophobic [16:26:50] I mean look at us here on Earth, call me a dreamer but I think if intelligent life confirmed its existence to us we'd see a drastic change for the better in world-views amongst most populations [16:27:03] to the point where we might actually all come together as a species like the humans in Star Trek did [16:27:24] just avoid the borg invasion first :) [16:28:43] in Star Trek lore wasn't there still international war on Earth when warp was discovered too? Wasn't it the arrival of the Vulcans that radically changed humanity's perspective? [16:28:58] they were after a nuclear war [16:29:14] Cochrane was a hippie [16:29:17] yes [16:29:42] launch to magic carpet ride lol [16:30:12] Tom Cochrane is a hippie? [16:30:23] zefram [16:39:21] Zefrank is a hippie? [16:40:14] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIpXYU-9CBM [16:40:15] YouTube - Star Trek Zefram Cochrane Warp Flight [16:40:38] note that trajectory, velocity, and distance is completely off [16:47:26] Q: What's the best way to get into Star Trek as a whole? [16:48:22] not with abrams [16:55:45] never seen that movie [16:57:09] Althego: they had to buy the rights for that song... [16:57:21] ...or did it last only 8 seconds in the movie? [17:00:28] GuestBanana: You dont need to watch it chronologically really [17:00:33] I mean, not by series anyway [17:00:43] But I'd honestly go for TNG first [17:01:37] TheKosmonaut: the reason I didn't get into star trek as a kid is that the stories required that your knew a bit of the background first [17:01:55] You dont really need much TOS knowledge to get into TNG [17:02:19] I know in insight it's irrelevant, but I was trying to remember who what species was and got real confused real fast [17:03:26] I think TOS was kinda like the SW OT, I mean yeah it's there and it's canon, but things didn't really get fleshed out until people started writing novels and subsequent series/movies came out [17:03:27] ve2dmn: yes, that was the whole lenght [17:03:51] some of TOS stuff is really really dated and not in-line with ST as a whole [17:04:40] and when people mention TOS I always think of that scene where the extra was turning an imaginary gear on the wall [17:04:54] tos has its charm, but honestly i find kirk annoying and it is really dated [17:05:41] if anything TNG really fleshed the universe out [17:05:44] imaginary gear? [17:05:55] what is that [17:05:56] so much so that they had spinoff mania with Voyager and DS9 [17:06:47] very few pixels, but here https://i.imgur.com/6iP0E9U.gif [17:06:48] https://i.imgur.com/6iP0E9U.gifv [17:08:14] I mean there is technically a crank in his hand, but what is it attached to, and why would there be a crank on a *highly advanced starship* in a hallway? [17:08:22] lol [17:08:49] gotta realize.. back when TOS was being made, it was sort of a different world back then on earth too [17:09:15] yes [17:09:18] very much [17:09:28] very yes [17:09:42] and it was about that too. that is why it has an international crew [17:09:50] "oi Captain, the clockwork that drives the automatic door to this crewman's cabin needs to be wound back up, lemme crank it" [17:10:12] maybe that let us closer to that world a bit. after all there is an iss [17:10:27] Let's hope so [17:10:35] do you think they have cranks on the ISS? :P [17:10:41] yes [17:10:43] madmerlyn: yes [17:10:51] maybe some special zero torque ones [17:10:53] There was also a number of struggles with production just with the idea of what the series was about [17:11:13] the thing that opens and closes the windows shutters [17:11:30] "this is the ISS dynamo, we crank it to power our laptops so we don't have to plug them in." [17:11:44] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSzuiqVjJg4 [17:11:44] YouTube - 7 HOLES in the Space Station - Smarter Every Day 135 [17:11:46] actually.. there is a little crank for the shutters on the ISS coupula dome [17:12:26] that's a logical place for a crank though [17:12:46] it's not on an interior hallway randomly attached to nothing on the wall [17:12:54] i think i saw this video [17:12:59] the 7 holes [17:13:04] maybe he was cranking on a flow tube for some fluid or gas line [17:13:35] gas on an antimatter powered starship? [17:13:43] certainly [17:13:46] mind you.. a bare wall, then suddenly some 'greeble' in one spot... then you look at TNG's hallways.. [17:13:50] madmerlyn: water [17:14:01] gas.. coulda been O2 [17:14:19] gor example [17:14:31] still can be lot of pneumatic mechanisms [17:14:39] madmerlyn: but yeah, it looks very silly [17:15:12] idea in acting was to make the ship look like it was active.. lived in [17:15:21] it's a bad filming but visual medium should be self-explanitory [17:15:36] -but +because [17:16:10] it would have probably looked pretty boring, weird if there was no one there at all... [17:16:47] or.. I don't know, maybe they were trying things out. Could have had people just walking by too.. [17:16:54] JCB: it makes it looks like a 1800s ship, not far future [17:17:18] If you look at the modern equivalent, it's people looking at screens [17:17:20] heh.. blame it on low budget? [17:18:16] that will probably look weird to someone in the future [17:18:42] as usual [17:18:46] but a ship from the future acting like a 'modern' submarine or sea vessel? sure [17:18:52] then again.. someone looking at a computer panel may also look weird as an idea to someone in our future.. nerual inplants [17:19:01] in hindsight most scifi things are never how people imagined them [17:20:48] I'm sort of 'eh', not sure what to make of the re-do of latest version of startrek designs. [17:20:53] ha I remember going on Spaceship Earth in 2001 (Epcot) before they updated it [17:21:02] still had the original 1960s narrative [17:21:09] i like the abrams design [17:21:15] they updated it? [17:21:29] i just dont like that they discarded all the star trek history [17:21:31] then again.. I sorta my own ideas [17:21:37] "By the year 2000, the entire workforce will be replaced by robots and humans will be free to spend their time on leisurely activities and more intellectual work" [17:21:57] except t hat the intellectual work is done by ais [17:22:11] "food will largely be replaced by pills, and flying cars will be common" [17:22:14] madmerlyn: nah, we just did like how ancesters did: use these tools to make us more productive and still work [17:22:56] the idea of a next genertiion ship is stupid. the ship's computer runs ais in its spare time for the holodeck. it could do all its jobs without humans [17:23:03] self driving cars.. trucks.. now they talk'n about removing pilots from planes... uh.. that might be pushing it a little too much [17:23:22] pilots are not very useful even now [17:23:28] ^ [17:23:36] they are largely there for other reasons [17:23:52] backup... look at the landing in the river in new york.. [17:23:53] so that there is somebody to take responsibility if anything happens [17:23:58] the humans on the TNG bridge were all playing KSP while the ship's computer did all the work [17:24:09] note that many accidents are caused by the humans [17:24:14] you are better off by removing them [17:24:28] going by that logic... starsihps fly themselves by the time we even get around to making them.. then agian, that wouldn't make too good a tv series [17:24:48] exactly [17:24:55] JCB: give them an AI, and it might makes a good TV series [17:24:57] accidents can be caused by weather too... [17:24:58] I mean our spaceships already fly themselves now [17:25:01] on the other hand i would say humans would be there because they liek to explore [17:25:25] I think the only reason astronauts are trained on manual control is for the event of systems failure [17:25:31] Althego: exactly. Took me 50h to be bored of No Man Sky [17:25:36] human exisistance is starting to look pretty grim [17:25:45] Also took me 400h to be bored of Minecraft [17:25:53] and ksp? [17:26:01] not bored yet, too many mods [17:26:17] 1550h according to Steam [17:26:38] Speaking of which, I didn't make it into space today [17:27:03] there's a reason Hawking and Musk think AI is dangerous [17:27:19] let it be dangerous [17:27:45] eh.. Musk wants all cars AI driven [17:27:46] if there's any real evidence of humanity's existence 1 billion years from now, it'll be in the form of AIs we've built that have managed to endure [17:27:50] humans die? nothing of value has been lost. as long as the machnes remember us as their creators, and store history and culture [17:27:57] madmerlyn: There is an interesting video in the last CCC about 'corporation as very slow AI' [17:28:08] yes but Musk started openAI or whatever to promote a conservative, safe development path of AI [17:28:22] he has serious concerns about some of the military stuff etc. that's being developed [17:29:17] If we build an AI, will it view us as a cat, a dog, a friend, a cow, a pig or a fly? [17:29:21] having a machine to decide who dies or lives... though that also depends on what sort of stuff you feed the machine to decide that. Or the limits [17:29:53] Think about how, we, act toward other creatures and the AI will probably follow similar trend. Some more hardcore then others [17:30:24] the key difference is AI won't have an impetus to kill and eat us [17:30:42] just hope the ai doesn't have a glitch.. [17:30:49] although if AI reaches "singularity" levels it could use our matter to reconfigure into micromachines [17:30:52] madmerlyn: instead we will have 'Brave New World' or 'we lucky Few' as a distopia? [17:31:20] madmerlyn: or turn us into them, slowly, organ by organ [17:31:33] borg. [17:31:40] kind of [17:31:40] AI turns us into borg [17:31:48] but without the necessary organic component [17:31:54] then again.. with AI like with phones, people would probably want the next best thing, even if it comes out ever few weeks. This idea of the scene from i-robot... machine graveyard [17:32:04] So, like in Stellaris: Assimilator, Exterminator or Rogue Servitor [17:32:22] I doubt there'd be robot graveyards, there'd be robot recycling centers [17:32:28] JCB: was it a good movie? [17:33:09] guess it was ok.. was based on book, didn't really read it. Friend had a copy, though at the time was pretty young. [17:33:28] I read the books, that's why I didn't see the film [17:33:49] got told it vaguely ressembled the books... [17:34:05] some of it was filmed across the river from where I lived [17:34:11] if you think about it, even the "latest model" will require a lot of the same components, there is already a demand to recycle them in that respect [17:34:56] there might be landfills filled with parts of robots that weren't valuable or useful enough to recycle though, if we don't embrace recycling more aggressively by the time we're building AI robots en masse [17:35:20] CGI movie Robots was pretty good. Friend found he had to watch it several times and was still finding a lot of details he missed [17:35:53] sorta touches on the idea of tossing out the old, for newer, though not always in best interests. [17:35:56] i prefer the cybran nation from supcom [17:36:00] Someone told me to watch 'ex-machina' [17:36:59] Althego: so let the AI do the background process and do the strategic thinking? [17:37:17] it is not specified what the components do [17:37:31] they are jsut define themselves as an organic-ai hybrid [17:37:45] Although, if I remember correctly, they are succeptible to 'hacking' [17:38:47] ghost in the shell... people's implants could get hacked.. [17:38:54] sufficiently advanced AI could only feasibly be hacked by another advanced AI [17:38:56] but I guess it makes them no different then to the religious cults in supcom [17:39:17] once the AIs start designing themselves they'll be well beyond the realm of human capability to reverse engineer in a meaningful manner [17:39:29] heh.. I've seen someone hack a SNES through the game controller.. not easy but was able to turn it into another game [17:39:41] in supcome the only side that is moreally ok are the cybrans [17:39:44] and SNES was designed by humans like 30 years ago [17:39:56] even though they have spiky red-black structures, they are the good [17:39:59] JCB: SMB3 is now beatable under 2 sec thanks to that [17:40:11] the other two sides are out for destruction [17:40:21] or religious fanatics [17:40:24] meh... never cared for speed runs [17:40:52] JCB: it's a tool assited speedrun... requires something like 8000 inputs per second [17:41:31] All Hail our TASbot overlords [17:41:52] ya.. they hooked a controller board to the game controller. exploited some kinks in the SNES hardware to get into the memory, change things around [17:47:05] great... my parents just lost power in this frigid weather. Let's hope the pipe don't burst [17:47:23] that wouldnt have changed the heating here [17:47:50] You probably don't have cheap power [17:49:16] a lot of US homes have both cheap power and non-electric heating [17:49:31] heating has almost nothing to do with the powergrid [17:49:33] especially in the north, where gas furnaces are more economical than heat pumps [17:49:53] madmerlyn: I don't think you understand how 'cheap' we have it [17:50:15] I have a heat pump because we only have on average a dozen or so days below freezing in my region [17:50:25] but many homes even in my area still use gas for heating [17:50:30] which does not require grid power to function [17:51:26] madmerlyn: yes, but my electric bill, which include heating, is less then 150CAD per month [17:51:47] can be as low as 45CAD some months [17:51:49] in Canada I doubt you're using a pure electric heating system [17:52:52] ground temperatures aren't stable enough unless you go deeper than normal for a heat pump, and using a thermal coil with raw AC isn't economical even with cheap electricity [17:52:53] I know very few people with gas heating [17:53:31] We aren't using heat pump below -15C if that is what you are thinking [17:55:21] madmerlyn: see map: https://i.redd.it/in8gs5nlzmzz.jpg [17:56:22] doesn't matter, if you're using a pure electric system to heat your home, you're going to use substantially more electricity to the point of it far exceeding market value for natural gas [17:56:58] we use gas here on west coast Canada.. but still need use of power [17:57:59] if I lived up north I'd have a potbelly stove and/or generator [17:58:17] let the convection from the stove push the air through the ventillation system [17:58:26] https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-526-s/2010001/t003-eng.htm [17:59:25] fellow I watch on youtube, sometimes heats his RV with a buddy heater... runs on propane bottles, doesn't need power [17:59:50] JCB: compared to me, you don't really need heating at all :P [18:00:15] ve2dmn how do you figure? [18:00:27] What's the current weather? [18:00:53] -7C here right now [18:02:01] just coming out of -1 or so... suppose to warm up only slightly [18:02:11] JCB: we had a cold advisory. Now it's lifted because it's 'only' -18C with no wind [18:02:28] most of Canada was under -10c or so the past few days [18:02:44] reginia was around -38c at night [18:02:54] Wind chill or not? [18:03:23] TBF "most of Canada" is the Northern Territories where like 17 Inuit live. [18:03:29] because if you account for wind chill, it was -46C in some places. [18:03:46] madmerlyn: over 70% of the population was under a cold advisory [18:04:09] doesn't 70% of the population live in the same region? [18:04:27] officially, no wind chill.. regina had low of -35c at night around dec 29-30 [18:04:50] 40% in Ontario, but the adivory stretched from Alberta all to way to Labrador [18:05:23] so it covered Alberta, Ontario and Quebec, which is around 70% of the population [18:06:13] everyone, save for my area and far east coast was stuck under -10c or way less the past few days [18:06:24] yeah this map shows the majority of the population being in 2 provinces, in 2 very small (relative) regions https://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-402-x/2010000/chap/geo/c-g/map1-eng.gif [18:07:19] yes. The Qubec-Windsor corridor is where 60% of the population lives [18:07:29] or close to [18:08:34] I'm in that purple area on the far west coast [18:08:58] see graph: https://i.imgur.com/Caok5Jf.png [18:11:09] The joke on reddit was that, since the advisory didn't cover Toronto at first 'nothing was happening in Canada' [18:11:42] people used to joke.. soon as you crossed into Canada, you'd hit year round snow.. and that eveyone lived in snow caves [18:12:13] pfft, southerners [18:12:27] greetings from the 62nd ;) [18:13:08] petti: how's the weather? [18:13:26] meh.. 49th here.. [18:14:20] cold don't bother me much. Wish we got more snow here... [18:14:24] ve2dmn: rainy.. :D [18:14:55] rest of Canada ends up under dozen feet of snow, we end up drowning all the time [18:14:57] no winter to speak of in 4 years or so [18:15:45] I'm below the 49th and I have the same climate as Jyväskylä [18:16:01] winter has not been very.. wintery in the last 10 years [18:16:14] yep, can't really compare the continents [18:16:48] not too sure who we'd compared with [18:17:02] 45th to be more precise [18:17:36] mind you... we've had some summers which were nothing but sun for months.. no rain at all [18:17:50] some part of siberia [18:18:03] Average low in January: 12.C, average high in July: 26.6C [18:18:50] I was in montreal a year ago, pretty breezy with -28 and high winds for a couple of days, otherwise it was quite ok [18:19:05] For comparison, Jyväskylä (at 62°14.52N) , has lows of 12C and highs of 21.8C [18:19:13] so, kind of the same climate [18:19:33] I'm on the coast so it's just wet and miserable [18:20:16] petti: we just don't get the 14hours per month of sunlight in december [18:20:18] not much difference between christmas and midsummer except for the amount of light :) [18:21:13] would love to take a drive up far north.. [18:21:39] JCB: I dream of going to see Auroras [18:21:56] but it took me hours to get to the 50th parallel [18:22:02] my brother has a house up at the arctic circle [18:22:27] last time I visited the ground was frozen a bit on the morning of 1st of july [18:23:13] petti: there is a lack of roads and civilization above the 50th parallel in Most of Quebec [18:24:23] I've seen the tundra in google earth. pretty vast void. [18:24:43] this entire region of 747161km^2 has a population of below 50k: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/LocationNord-du-Qu%C3%A9bec.png [18:25:53] ve2dmn I've seen.. well sorta [18:26:11] oddly enough, it came down as far south as my area once [18:26:14] there are a few mines, but the entire thing is just too remote for anythingof economic value. And no good river [18:26:46] JCB: It came down all the way to florida once. See http://www.spaceweather.com/ [18:27:35] right now: no sunspots [18:29:19] sun still in low cycle... they thinking its in some kind of other bigger cycle [18:29:36] petti: The only issue I ever had with fins was over Santa [18:30:16] JCB: our fourrier analysis of the Sun Cycle frequency is not perfect [18:30:20] also.. ouch.. 34km/s object... [18:30:32] wonder if thats our visitor from outside the system [18:31:03] http://spaceweathergallery.com/indiv_upload.php?upload_id=141581 [18:31:10] http://www.astronomy.com/news/2017/11/close-calls-in-space [18:31:25] I wanted to go to Iceland, but everyone seems to go there these days... [18:32:59] Iceland is on my vacation list in the next decade or so [18:33:06] want to go see the Aurora Borealis [18:34:24] oh feh.. uses applet.. which doesn't work on 64 bit systems.. sigh [18:40:23] applet? [18:40:41] java applet from a galaxy far far away? [18:49:13] website wanted to have java applet to show the astroid's orbit.. [18:49:30] but since I'm on a 64 bit system.. it won't work [18:50:05] link? [18:50:26] I went down the rabbit hole of comparing energy prices for 1 KWh equivalent in several regions [18:52:26] The reasons I don't have gas heating is because the infrastructure is just not there. Very few pipes in the ground because electrification was the main focus of infrastructure construction [18:53:09] It would probably be around 20% cheaper with gas heating, but the installation cost would be VERY high [18:53:10] I was looking at this astroid.. mostly for the fact it lists it at 34km/s [18:53:10] https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=276033&orb=1 [18:54:02] major city in my area wanted to have all gas and anything carbon related pulled out, turn everything into electric. Caused a bit of an uproar.. [18:54:25] also turns out, an organization was trying to push for something and was getting a bit of a kick back from the electric company.. I think [18:54:46] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(276033)_2002_AJ129 [18:55:18] weaponized law, the reason we can't have proper progress in a lot of utilities. [18:55:44] oh wait i donteven have java installed lol [18:56:45] didn't java just get tossed out the window at some point a while back? [18:56:57] madmerlyn: I would rather rant about my lack of proper internet then paying 20CAD more for heating every 2 months 6month per year [18:57:07] not really [18:57:20] "7 billion devices run java" - unchanged for many years :) [18:57:29] flash is almost dead [18:57:39] but both are almost as bad [18:59:50] For the record, my electric bill is lower then my Internet price [19:00:01] by about 30-40% [19:00:15] eh well java doesn't run 64bit.. oh wel [19:00:25] so you have a very good energy saving home ;) [19:00:41] I pay 70CAD per month on power, and more then 100CAD per month for crappy ADSL (uncapped) [19:02:04] User57893: not that much. My highest bill was 2788 kWh for 2 months and my lowest was 943 kwh for 2 month [19:02:24] I'm bill every 2 month. why? no idea. [19:02:37] java is multi platform it should run on any system [19:04:27] found on Java's website: We have detected you are using the 64-bit version of Firefox which will not run the Java plugin. [19:05:05] also: The 64-bit version of Firefox does not support NPAPI plug-ins, including Java. [19:05:13] now that is a real reason [19:05:25] doesnt matter let it die peacefully [19:06:16] seems after firefox v52, it dropped java support [19:12:57] JCB: it should be dead by now [19:13:05] but you found a zombie website [19:13:21] what is dead is java in browser then [19:13:29] java will be here for a long time [19:13:33] not that i want it [19:14:17] if it really came down to it.. I'd just drag the little laptop machine out.. since its only 32bit.. use that to check the site. [19:14:31] not a big deal.. I found a rough idea of the orbital path on google images.. [19:14:55] I'm just kind of wasting time.. trying to push my sleep back to normal again. [19:38:53] Hey, everybody. [19:39:08] hi [19:39:13] argh [19:39:17] i hate it when it does that [19:39:31] How are you? [19:39:40] hey. Fine thx [19:40:13] No problem. [19:46:22] https://thenextweb.com/opinion/2018/01/02/comcast-celebrates-repeal-of-net-neutrality-by-hiking-prices-in-2018/ [19:46:35] haha [19:49:02] Hey, Madmerlyn. [19:49:17] hi [19:49:33] How are you? [19:49:56] it's 2018 and I still have 1 viable ISP option at my residence. Well at least I have my health. [19:50:08] hehe [19:51:23] local electric Co-op needs to hurry their rollout up [19:51:34] transform and rollout! :) [19:51:36] I want uncapped fiber internet from a company I actually have faith in [19:51:52] and oddly fitting, because transformers are regularly used by electric companies :) [19:52:26] yeah local coop, Ozarks Electric, has started a secondary company with the goal of providing FTTH to all their customers, even rural ones [19:53:03] Blaank: did you see this yet? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ymcvZtkokQ (I remembered you asked about space engineers but good) [19:53:04] YouTube - Stationeers - Building A Space Station using Both Hands [19:53:05] I'm unfortunately in a neighborhood that doesn't have them for electric BUT I'm sandwiched in between 2 rural areas that they do service so their fiber lines are going to come right through my neighborhood on the way there anyway [19:53:22] so I'm in their "future service" category atm [19:53:29] probably 5 years out I'd wager [19:53:59] just long enough for Cox to really screw me with their deregulation victory last month [19:56:43] petti derp.. just finished watching that... sorta 'ummm.. like the idea of the game physics.. not sold on the style they went with' [19:58:10] yeah, it's not for me for sure [19:58:53] ugh, why's everything gotta be on steam [19:59:22] where else should it be [20:00:27] develeoper's site? [20:01:05] I prefer shopping from one place [20:01:33] as long as it does not mean too much DRM and such trouble [20:01:45] I wouldn't mind getting space engineers, but its, having to get setup on steam, having to get setup on paypal, having to register the game through online means before can even play it... [20:02:07] https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/01/spacex-will-try-to-launch-the-mysterious-zuma-satellite-again-thursday/ [20:02:35] paypal is pretty low hassle and secure since no credit card is required [20:03:10] I didn't like the whole steamy thing until I actually started using it, now it seems to work OK for most things. [20:03:51] I wasn't too happy though when I bought skyrim on physical media and... well it required me to register into steam in order to play my game off the DVD... [20:04:04] I heard a few things in the past, issues people had with steam.. but who knows now. Guess maybe I'm old, like actual physical copies. Not just a right to use code [20:04:06] but then again that might have been the last game I bought on a disc. [20:04:54] lol.. physical media not so physical... its just a 'link' to get you started in downloading the game, then register it [20:05:06] yeah, that sucks [20:06:41] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Deddly' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [20:25:46] haha [20:26:51] I think I might actually do a r/KSP challenge this week [20:27:08] what is the challenge? [20:27:26] it's a duna land and return mission, no more than 10t, each kerbin launch can only contribute 2t [20:27:36] hard mode is no fuel transferring [20:28:03] so you have to assemble a duna mission in orbit from 2 t payloads? [20:28:06] and now I think I understand why normal mode is easier.. you could lift 2t of drymass and siphon fuel off the lifter for it? [20:28:13] or 2 t vehicles? [20:28:13] yes [20:28:28] 2t per launch, but can be assembled into larger vessel [20:28:52] I'm thinking of doing like a cupcake lander style deal, command chair inside a service bay [20:29:09] I also think the wording says it has to be assembled in low orbit [20:29:29] so I'm thinking for launch vehicle I use my stock mk3 spaceplane the "Gallahad" and park my pieces at 245km orbit [20:29:35] still technically low orbit :P [20:30:01] assemble and transfer out from there [20:30:52] what does it mean fuel transfer between parts? [20:31:03] by the fuel transfer menu? or by the normal flow? [20:31:12] I've found at ~250km what you lose in Oberth isn't greater than the difference in cost vs. transferring out from a lower orbit [20:31:21] I think they mean manually moving fuel around [20:31:34] like you can't launch a dry tank and then fill it up [20:33:38] this shouldnt be too hard [20:34:18] 10t is a pretty slim budget though [20:34:21] i just dont like the fact the small payload would mean more wasted fuel [20:34:41] only if you were using an oversized rocket [20:34:56] the "scenario" was that the only rocket available could only lift a 2t payload, but could be reused [20:35:36] i think it would be better normally to put the whole thing on a single rocket [20:35:48] if you had a rocket capable of that sure [20:36:05] I think the idea is combining orbital assembly with a low tonnage interplanetary mission [20:36:35] the part I'm pondering is assembly tugs.. do you have to use that as part of your payload? [20:36:48] it's too bad there isn't a stock canadarm :P [20:37:01] why would you need that? [20:37:23] put your 2t in orbit, use arm to dock all the pieces together, no need to waste mass on RCS or vernors [20:37:24] you just need to slam few tanks and engines together [20:37:49] like the whole 1 unit of rcs need normally? [20:37:57] and can even skip on that [20:38:01] how do you put just 1 unit of RCS in it? [20:38:11] no, i mean that is what is needed for a docking [20:38:14] or even less [20:38:23] and certianly it is possible to dock without rcs [20:38:59] maybe.. since the payload just has to be 2t, I can design my rocket so the upper stage is also the docking probe [20:39:25] that way no wasted mass on the final vessel [20:40:04] u can use an extra "vehicle" for docking [20:40:15] not needed [20:40:24] I think I'm going to try Apollo style though, have a lightweight lander for Duna, and a transfer vessel to meet up with in orbit [20:40:36] obviously the best [20:40:58] space train [20:41:24] lander with side engines at front, buncha fuel tanks behind it [20:41:50] I posted on reddit asking if all parts have to return to kerbin [20:42:00] but that also causes some overead, and from duna to kerbin is less than from duna surface to duna orbit [20:42:02] it's very vague on the requirements for returning [20:42:20] if I can ditch the lander after making orbit again it makes everything a lot easier [20:42:33] it doesnt say that everything has to return [20:42:49] but wouldnt matter much anyway because of the overhead [20:42:56] well the wording is: Assemble a craft in low orbit around Kerbin in 5 launches, then fly it to Duna and back [20:43:44] i would interpret it (based on the premise): land a kerbal on it on duna and then make it back with the surface sample [20:44:29] so you think taking the whole vessel to surface and back would be more practical in 10t gross mass than a lightweight lander would? [20:45:37] no [20:45:53] I didn't know IR was allowed in subreddit challenges, that seems like it would make a lot of things easier [20:45:59] i say it is practical to havea single 10 t launch, but the challenge explicitly forbids it [20:46:11] without actually limiting anything, because docking ports are light [20:46:53] i would leave the return craft in duna orbit [20:47:24] if i found it hard to make an ssto from duna to kerbin [20:47:35] but that is probably not too hard, did that many times [20:47:42] one docking less [20:48:14] but even then, i would lose some stages going to duna [20:48:17] well really you don't even have to dock with a dedicated lander, just rendezvous [20:48:36] provided it was attached to the main craft without a docking port somehow [20:48:37] because the goal is to get the surface ssample [20:48:41] in 2t payload launches [20:49:20] you dont even need a cabin for that [20:49:27] Redbiertje confirmed just the kerbal needs to come back [20:49:30] i just usually avoid cabinless designs [20:49:47] and he said transferring fuel after landing at Duna for balancing purposes is ok [20:49:52] now if you combine that with a crew report, then you would need a cabin too [20:50:51] and he said SSTO planes are allowed as launch vehicle [20:51:20] so I'll just send a mk3 plane up to 245km orbit with an assembly probe since probe won't count against weight requirements [20:53:49] :3 [20:53:52] Althego I think another reason the 2t requirement is there: it disallows Nukes [20:53:58] obviously [20:55:12] can i go to laythe instead? :) [20:56:11] can you build a mass efficient stock prop in less than 2t? Would the lift from a stock prop be enough to realize mass efficiency over just using that mass for additional fuel? [20:56:32] a stock prop gives you infinite delta v [20:56:44] the problem is it d oesnt give you infinite speed [20:57:18] right, and Duna's atmo is small, so can you save enough dv by flying a stock prop through Duna's atmosphere instead of burning out of it [20:57:27] no [20:57:35] on eve however [20:58:04] you can fly up with it to say 10 km where the remainig chemical engines would be more efficient, thus needing less fuel [20:58:55] if you use an external command chair lander, can you get to the surface of Duna safely without retrothrust using a parachute you think? [20:59:20] it is still better to pack at least an ant [20:59:37] or maybe try one of the small metal plates as lending leg [20:59:45] ha, can you make orbit with only 2kN of thrust? [20:59:47] the half sized i beam like thingie [21:00:06] not sure, but it would be enough to land you with a parachute [21:00:26] the problem is the atmosphere is not enough for a parachute lannding normally [21:00:47] so even with a tiny engine and a minimal amount of fuel you are lighter than the amount of parachutes needed [21:01:04] I was thinking like an oscar with a spark on it and a reaction wheel + command chair [21:01:15] or pack a crush zone that explodes, or some tolerant parts [21:01:40] anyway for landing you probably dont need more than 200 m/s [21:01:58] if you are lightenough [21:02:06] or have one parachute [21:05:06] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Badie' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [21:12:31] lol I use better atmospheres and FAR so all this talk about duna's atmosphere and I'm like what atmosphere [21:12:56] FAR got rid of the Duna atmosphere? [21:13:25] FAR is an allowed mod [21:13:32] I know someone made a stock plane that uses only Xenon and made it into orbit... [21:13:34] er, I meant realistic atmospheres [21:13:43] ...BEFORE the ion drive was boosted [21:14:29] FAR doesn't get rid of Duna's atmosphere but it does mean you can't really fly [21:14:56] even with huge wings, you can't fly on duna any slower than mach 1.5 [21:15:24] What's the speed of sound in the Martian atmosphere? [21:15:30] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Supernovy' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [21:15:45] Evening, Gentlemen. [21:16:10] a quick google says the speed of sound on Mars is 240m/s [21:16:46] realistic atmospheres does help a little, by making duna's atmosphere deeper (up to 70 km) [21:17:03] so Mach 1 on mars would be 864km/h [21:18:27] relistic atmospheres makes Eve flybys even more broken, because Eve's atmosphere only goes up to 55 km because of the high lapse rate caused by eve's high gravity [21:19:02] I wonder if kOS knows this [21:20:15] flying by Eve at 90 km is broken enough but you can basically reverse your trajectory relative to Eve with a 55 km flyby [21:24:19] dammit ksp crashed [21:24:50] bummer [21:25:05] I haven't had any KSP crashes since I stopped using Steam overlay (on Linux) [21:25:40] it always crashes on load [21:26:58] ve2dmn you gonna do this week's reddit challenge? [21:27:04] I think it's going to be my project tonight [21:27:40] what's the challenge? [21:28:38] Duna landing and back, maximum weight 10, can only launch 2t at a time, hard mode no fuel transfers [21:29:01] so basically you can assemble a vessel up to 10t in low orbit, with only 2 tons per launch [21:29:12] that's beyond my habilities, but I could try [21:29:23] #KSPOfficial: mode change '+o Judge_Dedd' by ChanServ!ChanServ@services.esper.net [21:29:34] well the payload only has to be 2t per launch, launch vehicle can be as big as you need [21:29:55] I'm going to send my pieces up in a spaceplane to 245km orbit and use a tug on the plane to assemble the pieces [21:31:19] I'm thinking a cupcake-style lander will be light and draggy enough to land and return from Duna cheaply enough [21:39:05] I wish I could run ksp in borderless window mode [21:45:06] play on linux and you can just put it in its own workspace :P [21:45:39] I could, that's true [21:48:07] wow... I have 100m/s of dv to make my 350km orbit into a 375km one for rendez-vous with my space hotel [21:48:20] ...out of an initial value of 5540 [21:57:03] one thing I love about doing Hohmann transfers in Kerbin orbit, super easy to set up [21:57:18] just push your AP out and move the node around the orbit until you get a super close encounter [21:58:39] I tried to go directly to 350km from ground [22:00:29] direct rendezvous are hard to do manually, that's why I don't do them :P [22:01:01] even when I have rescue contracts that are in the 70-80km range, I usually just push my rescue craft into a higher orbit to catch them [22:01:03] the timing was real bad. They are at the opposite sides of kerbin. [22:01:19] I might revert and do it again at 80km [22:01:23] in that case you almost certainly should have parked in a lower orbit and did a Hohmann [22:01:54] I'm trying to see what used less dV. Then I'll try doing the math :D [22:02:19] I know for a fact going from like 175km to 350km with Hohmann around Kerbin with similar inclination will put you around 80m/s relative at encounter [22:03:03] I just want a 'close enough encouter' that I can then wait out with KAC [22:03:33] park in 175km orbit and Hohmann out and you can make encounter in less than 2 orbits every time [22:03:47] which comes out to like what.. 1 in game hour? [22:04:18] less time than timewarping for the optimal launch window I'd wager [22:04:39] the dv savings for direct ascent probably isn't significant either [22:04:54] maybe 100m/s or so that you spent on circularization at lower orbit [22:06:53] say you have a 100kmx175km orbit. which would be more efficient: several burns at 100km to raise to 350km or a single burn at 175km and then circularise at 350km. [22:07:02] I'm thinking the low orbit is better [22:07:11] because Hoffman [22:07:39] the higher eccentricity can increase your relative velocity on the final encounter though, increasing the amount of dv you have to spend there [22:08:16] and doing it that way would require you wait until your phase angle is right so you can do your burn at peri to benefit from oberth [22:08:37] right [22:09:09] a proper circular to circular Hohmann maneuver you don't have to wait for phase angles, you just burn at the appropriate spot in your own orbit [22:09:47] but then my encouter would be at high speed and I don't think I have enough thrust [22:09:52] and even still, doing the eccentric one will increase circularization cost on the final orbit [22:09:59] due to higher relative velocity coming in [22:10:28] this is also a test of my kOS scripts... so this is not my first revert :D [22:10:37] because 'check yo staging' [22:11:19] I'd love to see math etc., oberth is a 2 way street AFAIK, you're saving by pushing apo out at peri, but then you have to circularize at apo which is much more highly eccentric than it would've been [22:11:47] I imagine the difference in dv costs is going to be very similar to just circularizing at 175km, but I've been wrong many times before [22:12:50] which is why I was trying to go to 350km from ground directly. The target is slightly above 350, so I would have an encouter eventually [22:14:09] The point was to get out of the atmosphere as soon as possible to limit air resistance, then burn at AP (350) [22:15:07] you should see what costs are for KSC>175km then Hohmann are vs. KSC>350 rendezvous [22:15:26] I personally default to Hohmann just because it's so much easier heh [22:16:05] yeah. But in this case, it's mostly automated, so I just want to see what I could do [22:17:12] on the case of kOS scripts, I think I'm going to put some logic in mine to better tune the target orbit [22:18:09] like maybe have an if statement during the main loop during "coasting stage" that if the current AP drops below the orbitHeight parameter to burn 10% at prograde until orbitHeight is exceeded again [22:20:31] because drag losses are dropping my orbits by as much as 5km on some launches [22:20:57] what I've been doing is just manually specifying like 178km instead of 175 [22:21:06] but I'd like it to be a bit more precise on the final orbit [22:57:13] going for a transfer orbit left me with 1000m/s more dV [23:20:48] If the rover can't land on Moho even with the extended-range ion upper stage, I think I'll have to do a manned mission with a much much larger craft [23:22:50] last attempt had 10km/s, this one has 11 km/s and will flyby Eve to save some [23:23:19] pff. just make it 17km/s. Problem solved [23:23:56] ve2dmn: Last time I went to Moho it was a manned mission using ion clusters, and had over 50 km/s [23:28:20] of course that was using the super-OP nuclear reactors [23:33:07] this time for my endgame ultracruisers I can use open-cycle gas core nuclear rockets [23:38:04] arrgh... I assembled a pair of docking ports upside down... [23:38:10] I have to do everything AGAIN